
Research Spotlight: Global Study Finds Improved Survival for Aggressive Blood Cancer with Early Use of Existing Drug Therapies
Research Spotlight: Global Study Finds Improved Survival for Aggressive Blood Cancer with Early Use of Existing Drug Therapies
Research Spotlight: Global Study Finds Improved Survival for Aggressive Blood Cancer with Early Use of Existing Drug Therapies
By Emmanuel Nwodo
By Emmanuel Nwodo


Mark Sorial, PharmD, BCOP
In this Q&A, lead author Mark Sorial, PharmD, BCOP, of PETAL Consortium at Massachusetts General Hospital, discusses his paper, “Forecasting optimal treatments in relapsed/refractory mature T- and NK-cell lymphomas: A global PETAL Consortium study” published in the British Journal of Haematology.
In this Q&A, lead author Mark Sorial, PharmD, BCOP, of PETAL Consortium at Massachusetts General Hospital, discusses his paper, “Forecasting optimal treatments in relapsed/refractory mature T- and NK-cell lymphomas: A global PETAL Consortium study” published in the British Journal of Haematology.
How would you summarize your study?
How would you summarize your study?
Mature T-cell lymphomas are a rare, aggressive group of blood cancers. With disease progression after receiving initial standard chemotherapy, there are only a few unique drug classes available for subsequent treatment, and there is no universally accepted standard of care for how to use them. Patients often cycle through different agents one after another, which are chosen based on small studies and limited available data. We used a rigorous study design with PETAL’s global dataset alongside three independent methods to examine each possible sequence of therapies, finding a survival benefit to using certain drugs earlier before others. This helps us use our available drugs more effectively and helps create a treatment framework that clinicians can use.
Mature T-cell lymphomas are a rare, aggressive group of blood cancers. With disease progression after receiving initial standard chemotherapy, there are only a few unique drug classes available for subsequent treatment, and there is no universally accepted standard of care for how to use them. Patients often cycle through different agents one after another, which are chosen based on small studies and limited available data. We used a rigorous study design with PETAL’s global dataset alongside three independent methods to examine each possible sequence of therapies, finding a survival benefit to using certain drugs earlier before others. This helps us use our available drugs more effectively and helps create a treatment framework that clinicians can use.
What did your study investigate?
What did your study investigate?
We examined the overall survival of patients with mature T-cell lymphoma who received any one of the following drug classes as their second or third type of therapy: cytotoxic chemotherapy (a cancer treatment that kills rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells), epigenetic modifiers (drugs that change the expression of genes without changing the DNA sequence itself), or small molecule inhibitors (drugs that are small enough that they can enter cells easily and block specific proteins involved in cancer development or signaling).
We examined the overall survival of patients with mature T-cell lymphoma who received any one of the following drug classes as their second or third type of therapy: cytotoxic chemotherapy (a cancer treatment that kills rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells), epigenetic modifiers (drugs that change the expression of genes without changing the DNA sequence itself), or small molecule inhibitors (drugs that are small enough that they can enter cells easily and block specific proteins involved in cancer development or signaling).
What methods or approach did you use?
What methods or approach did you use?
We carefully studied patients with T-cell lymphoma from around the world using real-life health data from the PETAL Consortium dataset. We also designed the study to compare the different sequential treatment options (12 total treatment paths that patients used) and to follow the rules of a prospective trial. This rigorous study is called an observational multi-intervention target-trial cohort study. We used three different methods to estimate and compare survival after treatment, including two machine learning models to find patterns and important disease characteristics in the data.
We carefully studied patients with T-cell lymphoma from around the world using real-life health data from the PETAL Consortium dataset. We also designed the study to compare the different sequential treatment options (12 total treatment paths that patients used) and to follow the rules of a prospective trial. This rigorous study is called an observational multi-intervention target-trial cohort study. We used three different methods to estimate and compare survival after treatment, including two machine learning models to find patterns and important disease characteristics in the data.
What did you find?
What did you find?
We found that using small molecule inhibitors earlier on in the treatment sequence, as early as the second treatment, improved survival compared to other second-line options. In the third treatment setting, epigenetic modifiers used after small molecule inhibitors also seemed to improve survival compared to most other strategies.
We found that using small molecule inhibitors earlier on in the treatment sequence, as early as the second treatment, improved survival compared to other second-line options. In the third treatment setting, epigenetic modifiers used after small molecule inhibitors also seemed to improve survival compared to most other strategies.
What are the implications?
What are the implications?
The immediate implications include modifying how we treat patients with T-cell lymphomas by using small molecule inhibitors as the second line of therapy in their care, especially in the patient subgroups that would likely benefit the most, such as patients with angioimmunoblastic or T-follicular helper cell subtypes of lymphoma. Additionally, this study provides a framework for how to personalize treatment selection for T-cell lymphoma and other diseases.
The immediate implications include modifying how we treat patients with T-cell lymphomas by using small molecule inhibitors as the second line of therapy in their care, especially in the patient subgroups that would likely benefit the most, such as patients with angioimmunoblastic or T-follicular helper cell subtypes of lymphoma. Additionally, this study provides a framework for how to personalize treatment selection for T-cell lymphoma and other diseases.
What are the next steps?
What are the next steps?
Moving forward, this study can help focus clinical studies and therapeutic advancement efforts on relevant drug classes such as small molecule inhibitors in patients that would benefit the most.
Moving forward, this study can help focus clinical studies and therapeutic advancement efforts on relevant drug classes such as small molecule inhibitors in patients that would benefit the most.
Disclosures:
Disclosures:
See the paper for the conflict-of-interest statement.
See the paper for the conflict-of-interest statement.
Funding:
Funding:
This work was supported by Secura Bio Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Kyowa Kirin, Acrotech Biopharma, and Center for Lymphoma Research Funds. Jain is supported by the National Cancer Institute Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08) (K08CA230498) and Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Lymphoma Research Funds. Jacobsen is supported by the Reid Family Fund for Lymphoma Research.
This work was supported by Secura Bio Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Kyowa Kirin, Acrotech Biopharma, and Center for Lymphoma Research Funds. Jain is supported by the National Cancer Institute Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08) (K08CA230498) and Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Lymphoma Research Funds. Jacobsen is supported by the Reid Family Fund for Lymphoma Research.
Paper cited:
Paper cited:
Sorial, M et al. “Forecasting optimal treatments in relapsed/refractory mature T- and NK-cell lymphomas: A global PETAL Consortium study.” British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.20063
Sorial, M et al. “Forecasting optimal treatments in relapsed/refractory mature T- and NK-cell lymphomas: A global PETAL Consortium study.” British Journal of Haematology. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.20063
@2025 PETAL Consortium • All rights reserved
@2025 PETAL Consortium • All rights reserved
@2025 PETAL Consortium • All rights reserved